Global disparities in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance (preprint)

Genomic sequencing provides critical information to track the evolution and spread of SARS-CoV-2, optimize molecular tests, treatments and vaccines, and guide public health responses. To investigate the spatiotemporal heterogeneity in the global SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance, we estimated the impact of sequencing intensity and turnaround times (TAT) on variant detection in 167 countries. Most countries submit genomes >21 days after sample collection, and 77% of low and middle income countries sequenced <0.5% of their cases. We found that sequencing at least 0.5% of the cases, with a TAT <21 days, could be a benchmark for SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance efforts. Socioeconomic inequalities substantially impact our ability to quickly detect SARS-CoV-2 variants, and undermine the global pandemic preparedness. One-Sentence SummarySocioeconomic inequalities impacted the SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance, and undermined the global pandemic preparedness.

Genomics-Informed Responses in the Elimination of COVID-19 in Australia (preprint)

BACKGROUND: A cornerstone of Australia’s ability to control COVID-19 has been effective border control, using an extensive supervised quarantine program. However, a rapid recrudescence in COVID-19 cases was observed in the state of Victoria in June 2020. Here, we describe the genomic findings that located the source of this second wave as a breach in supervised hotel quarantine and demonstrate the successful elimination of COVID-19 for a second time in Australia.METHODS: Genome sequencing was performed on all available SARS-CoV-2-positive samples in Victoria and integrated genomic and epidemiological investigation undertaken.RESULTS: At 31st January 2021, 20,451 COVID-19 cases were reported in Victoria; samples were sequenced from 75% of cases (15,431/20,451). Genomics revealed 98% (10,426/10,646) of locally-acquired cases during the second wave were derived from a single incursion from hotel quarantine, with the outbreak strain rapidly detected in other Australian states and territories. Phylodynamic analyses indicated an epidemic growth rate comparable to emerging variants, such as B.1.1.7 in the United Kingdom. Strict public health interventions resulted in the elimination of the outbreak strain by 29th October 2020. Subsequent cases represented independent international or interstate introductions, with limited local spread.CONCLUSIONS: Rapid escalation of clonal outbreaks can occur from even a single breach of control practices, as revealed through our genomic ‘enhanced outbreak-detection' system. The subsequent elimination and rapid control of new SARS-CoV-2 incursions reinforce that decisive public health responses to emergent cases are effective even with high epidemic growth rates, and “elimination” should be favored in settings where this is achievable.FUNDING STATEMENT: The Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory (MDU PHL) and the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL) at The Doherty Institute are funded by the Victorian Government. This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (NHMRC); Partnership Grant (APP1149991), Investigator Grant to BPH (APP1196103), Investigator Grant to DAW (APP1174555), Research Fellowship to TPS (APP1105525), MRFF COVID-19 Genomics Grant (MRF9200006).DECLARATION OF INTERESTS: None to declare. ETHICS APPROVAL STATEMENT: Data were collected in accordance with the Victorian Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008. Ethical approval was received from the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (study number 1954615.3).

Multi-Site Assessment of Rapid, Point-of-Care Antigen Testing for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Low-Prevalence Setting: A Validation and Implementation Study (preprint)

Background: In Australia, COVID-19 diagnosis relies on RT-PCR testing which is relatively costly and time-consuming. To date, no studies have assessed the performance and implementation of rapid antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 testing in a setting with a low prevalence of COVID-19 infections, such as Australia. Methods: This study recruited participants presenting for COVID-19 testing at three Melbourne metropolitan hospitals during a period of low COVID-19 prevalence. The Abbott PanBioTM COVID-19 Ag point-of-care test was performed alongside RT-PCR. In addition, participants with COVID-19 notified to the Victorian Government were invited to provide additional swabs to aid validation. Implementation challenges were also documented. Findings: The specificity of the Abbott PanBioTM COVID-19 Ag test was 99.96% (95% CI 99.73 - 100%). Sensitivity amongst participants with RT-PCR-confirmed infection was dependent upon the duration of symptoms reported, ranging from 78.9% (duration 1 to 33 days) to 100% in those within 7 days of symptom onset. A range of implementation challenges were identified which may inform future COVID-19 testing strategies in a low prevalence setting. Interpretation: Given the high specificity, antigen-based tests may be most useful in rapidly triaging public health and hospital resources while expediting confirmatory RT-PCR testing. Considering the limitations in test sensitivity and the potential for rapid transmission in susceptible populations, particularly in hospital settings, careful consideration is required for implementation of antigen testing in a low prevalence setting. Funding: This work was funded by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. The funder was not involved in data analysis or manuscript preparation.Declaration of Interests: All authors: no conflicts.Ethics Approval Statement: Ethics review and study approval was provided by Monash Health Human Research and Ethics Committee (RES-20-0000-678A) and local Governance approval was provided by Melbourne Health and Austin Health Offices for Research.

Implementation and evaluation of a novel real-time multiplex assay for SARS-CoV-2: In-field learnings from a clinical microbiology laboratory (preprint)

The unprecedented scale of testing required to effectively control the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated urgent implementation of rapid testing in clinical microbiology laboratories. To date, there are limited data available on the analytical performance of emerging commercially available assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and integration of these assays into laboratory workflows. Here, we performed a prospective validation study of a commercially available assay, the AusDiagnostics Coronavirus Typing (8-well) assay. Respiratory tract samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing were collected between 1st March and 25th March 2020. All positive samples and a random subset of negative samples were sent to a reference laboratory for confirmation. In total, 2,673 samples were analyzed using the Coronavirus Typing assay. The predominant sample type was a combined nasopharyngeal/throat swab (2,640/2,673; 98.8%). Fifty-four patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (0.02%) using the Coronavirus Typing assay; 53/54 (98.1%) positive results and 621/621 (100%) negative results were concordant with the reference laboratory. Compared to the reference standard, sensitivity of the Coronavirus Typing assay for SARS-CoV-2 was 100% [95% CI 93.2%-100%], specificity 99.8% [95% CI 99.1%-100%], positive predictive value 98.1% (95% CI 90.2%-99.7%] and negative predictive value 100% [95% CI 99.4%-100%]. In many countries, standard regulatory requirements for the introduction of new assays have been replaced by emergency authorizations and it is critical that laboratories share their post-market validation experiences, as the consequences of widespread introduction of a sub-optimal assay for SARS-CoV-2 are profound. Here, we share our in-field experience, and encourage other laboratories to follow suit.